What does Trojan do better than Subglow?

We call out three honest strengths: (Raw sniping speed) Trojan is one of the fastest Pump.fun snipers in the Telegram ecosystem. If you manually target fresh launches and want to be first in the block, they're a legit pick. (Telegram-native workflow) Everything happens in Telegram — no web app, no dashboard. Lean users love this; others find it limiting. (Referral economics) Trojan pays generous referral revenue shares. If you run a community, their referral program is aggressive.

What does Subglow do better than Trojan?

We call out four advantages: (Real copy-trading engine) Trojan's copy-trade features are a thin wrapper around their sniper. Subglow has a proper copy-trade engine with per-wallet configs, proportional sells, and server-side trigger loops for TP/SL/trailing. (Portfolio-level risk) Subglow tracks your entire copy-trade portfolio and enforces portfolio-% limits and per-token SOL caps across it. Trojan is per-trade — you set sizes manually each time. (Web dashboard) Some users want a proper dashboard for history, analytics, and config. Subglow has /copy-trade/positions, /history, and /analytics pages. Trojan is Telegram-only. (Per-trade economics at volume) Trojan charges 0.9% per trade. Subglow is 0.2%. At 100 copied trades/week × 1 SOL, that's 70 SOL/week in fee difference.

Can I use both Trojan and Subglow?

Yes — most serious Solana traders use 2-3 tools. A common stack: Trojan for its strongest feature, Subglow for automated copy trading with proper portfolio-level risk rules. There's no lock-in either way.

When should I NOT pick Subglow?

If you match these conditions, stay with Trojan: You're a Telegram-only degen who wants the fastest sniper and tolerates a thinner copy-trade module.; You run a trading community and want aggressive referral economics.; You value zero web-app surface area (some people genuinely prefer this).. Subglow is the right call when: You actually want copy trading — not sniping-with-copy-bolt-on.; You want proportional sells, trailing stops, and portfolio-level risk.; You run high copy-trade volume and 0.2% vs 0.9% per trade materially changes your PnL..

Honest comparison · Updated 2026

Subglow vs Trojan

Telegram-native Solana sniper bot

Trojan is a hardcore Telegram sniper bot with one of the fastest buy pipelines on Solana. It's not really a copy-trading product — it has basic wallet-copy features, but its DNA is sniping. If you want automated copy with portfolio-level risk rules, Subglow is the better fit.

Try Subglow free →Visit Trojan →

Where Subglow wins

Real copy-trading engine
Trojan's copy-trade features are a thin wrapper around their sniper. Subglow has a proper copy-trade engine with per-wallet configs, proportional sells, and server-side trigger loops for TP/SL/trailing.
Portfolio-level risk
Subglow tracks your entire copy-trade portfolio and enforces portfolio-% limits and per-token SOL caps across it. Trojan is per-trade — you set sizes manually each time.
Web dashboard
Some users want a proper dashboard for history, analytics, and config. Subglow has /copy-trade/positions, /history, and /analytics pages. Trojan is Telegram-only.
Per-trade economics at volume
Trojan charges 0.9% per trade. Subglow is 0.2%. At 100 copied trades/week × 1 SOL, that's 70 SOL/week in fee difference.

Where Trojan wins

Raw sniping speed
Trojan is one of the fastest Pump.fun snipers in the Telegram ecosystem. If you manually target fresh launches and want to be first in the block, they're a legit pick.
Telegram-native workflow
Everything happens in Telegram — no web app, no dashboard. Lean users love this; others find it limiting.
Referral economics
Trojan pays generous referral revenue shares. If you run a community, their referral program is aggressive.

Pricing, head to head

Subglow

0.2% flat fee per copied trade · no subscription on Basic · Pro $49/mo unlocks 25 wallets + trailing stops + custom filters

Trojan

0.9% fee per trade (lower with referral tier) · no subscription

Feature by feature

Every row below is verifiable from public docs as of 2026-04. Something out of date? Tell us via live chat and we'll update within 24h.

Feature	Subglow	Trojan
Telegram interface	shipping soon	Yes
Web dashboard	Yes	No
Manual sniping (Pump.fun)	not primary	Yes
Automated copy trading	Yes	basic
Proportional sells	Yes	No
Trailing stop	Yes	No
Per-token exposure cap	Yes	No
Portfolio % limit	Yes	No
Per-trade fee	0.2%	0.9%
Open-sourced execution pipeline docs	Yes	No

Pick Trojan when

You're a Telegram-only degen who wants the fastest sniper and tolerates a thinner copy-trade module.
You run a trading community and want aggressive referral economics.
You value zero web-app surface area (some people genuinely prefer this).

Pick Subglow when

You actually want copy trading — not sniping-with-copy-bolt-on.
You want proportional sells, trailing stops, and portfolio-level risk.
You run high copy-trade volume and 0.2% vs 0.9% per trade materially changes your PnL.

Our honest verdict

Trojan is a sniper first, copy bot second. Subglow is the opposite. If your primary use case is mirroring KOL wallets with real risk rules, Subglow is built for it. If your primary use case is manually sniping fresh launches in Telegram and occasionally tagging a wallet to follow, Trojan wins. These are different tools — pick the one that matches 80% of what you actually do.

FAQ

Is Subglow cheaper than Trojan?: Per-trade economics: Subglow is 0.2% flat on Basic. Trojan's effective rate per trade is 0.9% fee per trade (lower with referral tier) · no subscription. Over heavy copy-trade volume (100+ trades/week) the difference typically favors Subglow.
What does Trojan do better than Subglow?: We call out three honest strengths: (Raw sniping speed) Trojan is one of the fastest Pump.fun snipers in the Telegram ecosystem. If you manually target fresh launches and want to be first in the block, they're a legit pick. (Telegram-native workflow) Everything happens in Telegram — no web app, no dashboard. Lean users love this; others find it limiting. (Referral economics) Trojan pays generous referral revenue shares. If you run a community, their referral program is aggressive.
What does Subglow do better than Trojan?: We call out four advantages: (Real copy-trading engine) Trojan's copy-trade features are a thin wrapper around their sniper. Subglow has a proper copy-trade engine with per-wallet configs, proportional sells, and server-side trigger loops for TP/SL/trailing. (Portfolio-level risk) Subglow tracks your entire copy-trade portfolio and enforces portfolio-% limits and per-token SOL caps across it. Trojan is per-trade — you set sizes manually each time. (Web dashboard) Some users want a proper dashboard for history, analytics, and config. Subglow has /copy-trade/positions, /history, and /analytics pages. Trojan is Telegram-only. (Per-trade economics at volume) Trojan charges 0.9% per trade. Subglow is 0.2%. At 100 copied trades/week × 1 SOL, that's 70 SOL/week in fee difference.
Can I use both Trojan and Subglow?: Yes — most serious Solana traders use 2-3 tools. A common stack: Trojan for its strongest feature, Subglow for automated copy trading with proper portfolio-level risk rules. There's no lock-in either way.
When should I NOT pick Subglow?: If you match these conditions, stay with Trojan: You're a Telegram-only degen who wants the fastest sniper and tolerates a thinner copy-trade module.; You run a trading community and want aggressive referral economics.; You value zero web-app surface area (some people genuinely prefer this).. Subglow is the right call when: You actually want copy trading — not sniping-with-copy-bolt-on.; You want proportional sells, trailing stops, and portfolio-level risk.; You run high copy-trade volume and 0.2% vs 0.9% per trade materially changes your PnL..